How 4 Federal Lawyers paved the way to kill Osama bin Laden


Weeks before President Barack Obama ordered the raid on Osama bin Laden's compound in May 2011, four administration lawyers hammered out rationales intended to overcome any legal obstacles — and made it all but inevitable that Navy SEALs would kill the fugitive Qaida leader, not capture him.
 


Stretching sparse precedents, the lawyers worked in intense secrecy. Fearing leaks, the White House would not let them consult aides or even the administration's top lawyer, attorney general Eric Holder. 

They did their own research, wrote memos on highly secure laptops and traded drafts hand-delivered by trusted couriers.

Just days before the raid, the lawyers drafted five secret memos so that if pressed later, they could prove they were not inventing after-the-fact reasons for having blessed it. 

"We should memorialize our rationales because we may be called upon to explain our legal conclusions, particularly if the operation goes terribly badly," said Stephen W Preston, the CIA's general counsel, according to officials familiar with the internal deliberations.


While the bin Laden operation has been much scrutinized, the story of how a tiny team of government lawyers helped shape and justify Obama's high-stakes decision has not been previously told. 

The group worked as military and intelligence officials conducted a parallel effort to explore options and prepare members of SEAL Team 6 for the possible mission.


The legal analysis offered the administration wide flexibility to send ground forces onto Pakistani soil without the country's consent, to explicitly authorize a lethal mission, to delay telling Congress until afterward, and to bury a wartime enemy at sea. By the end, one official said, the lawyers concluded that there was "clear and ample authority for the use of lethal force under US and international law."


Some legal scholars later raised objections, but criticism was muted after the successful operation. The administration lawyers, however, did not know at the time how events would play out, and they faced the "unenviable task" of "resolving a cluster of sensitive legal issues without any consultation with colleagues," said Robert M. Chesney, a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin who worked on a Justice Department detainee policy task force in 2009.
 


"The proposed raid required answers to many hard legal questions, some of which were entirely novel despite a decade's worth of conflict with al-Qaida," Chesney said.

This account of the role of the four lawyers — Preston; Mary B. DeRosa, the National Security Council's legal adviser; Jeh C. Johnson, the Pentagon general counsel; and then-Rear Adm. James W. Crawford III, the Joint Chiefs of Staff legal adviser — is based on interviews with more than a half-dozen current and former administration officials who had direct knowledge of the planning for the raid. 

While outlines of some of the government's rationales have been mentioned previously, the officials provided new insights and details about the analysis and decision-making process.

The officials described the secret legal deliberations and memos for a forthcoming book on national security legal policy under Obama. Most spoke on the condition of anonymity because the talks were confidential.


TOI
Share on Google Plus
    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment